Argument characteristics

This is a mind map about the characteristics of argumentation. The main contents include: argumentation method, argumentation language, argumentation structure, and argumentation method. The introduction is detailed and the knowledge is comprehensive. I hope it can be helpful to everyone!

Edited at 2024-10-18 01:00:20

HudsonC

Recent works View more works>>

Argument characteristics

HudsonC

Recent works View more works>>

Recommended to you
Outline

Argument characteristics

Argument method

argument

Raise a question (argument) → analyze the problem (develop an argument) → Solve a problem (draw a conclusion)

Refute

Come to a wrong point of view → refute the wrong point of view → Make the right point

argument structure

Parallel type: there is no priority between the layers

Layer-by-layer approach: step by step between each layer

Contrast: Comparing two opinions or arguments

Total fraction: first summarize, then analyze (denotation)

Comprehensive: not simply using a certain structure

Argument method

Demonstration with examples: reasoning with examples

Reasoning and argumentation: reasoning and quoting classics

Comparative argument: pros and cons, argumentation point of view

Metaphorical argument: using metaphors to make sense

Causal argument: trace the country from the cause, trace the cause from the effect

Argument by analogy: comparison with similar things

Reductio ad absurdum: first assuming something is true and then drawing an absurd conclusion to prove it is false

language of argument

Rigorous language makes the argument rigorous

The language is easy to understand and makes the argument persuasive.

Use personification and metaphor to make your argument vivid and vivid

Use questions to attract attention or make people think, etc.

Argument ideas

Writing structure Argumentation method

① The argumentation ideas and process should clearly explain how the relationship between the viewpoints, arguments, argumentation methods and structure of the full text is presented.

② Focus on the argumentation process, and there must be subject terminology, such as "proposing... arguments", "elaboration", "reasoning", "drawing conclusions", etc.

③It is best to use connecting words to express the flow of thought in the article, such as "first", "then", "then" and "finally".

Answer steps

1. Ask questions ① By writing examples (or interesting anecdotes, allusions, legends, famous quotes) of..., put forward the arguments (ask questions) of... (or introduce the topic) ② Directly raise... The argument of... (or a thesis that leads to...)

2. Analyze the problem ① Use examples of... (allusions, legends, fables or quotations) to demonstrate the argument from the front (or back); ② Demonstrate the argument from several aspects. (This format can be used when there are sub-arguments)

3. Solve the problem ① Draw the conclusion... ② Summarize the full text ③ Summarize the arguments ④ Issue a call, put forward hope, etc.

There is a sequence, it is a matter of ideas

Writing ideas (writing context)

③ Pay attention to standard wording and use words that reflect the idea or order of writing. (eg: first, second, then, last)

①Answer what to write first, what to write next, what to write next, what to write last, Divide the whole text into different levels, summarize the writing content, and answer the points in sequence.

②When clarifying the hierarchical structure of the article, grasp the title and argument of the article, Pay attention to the logical relationship between paragraphs, divide them into levels, and summarize them.