This death penalty pros and cons diagram in India depicts the various benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty. There are cases of heinous crimes that are beyond rehabilitation. In such cases, capital punishment not only creates a deserved punishment equal to the crime committed but also ensures the safety of society as a whole. It also prevents such crimes from being committed in the future. The death penalty eliminates the possibility of escaping the consequences of a criminal's actions. It removes the case of an illegal escape, as demonstrated by the pros and cons of the death penalty in India.
Tags:
Similar Mind Maps
Outline
CAPITALPUNISHMENT
WHAT
LEGALLY KILLING
PERSON-SERIOUS CRIME
DEATH PENALTY
NOT ALWAYS
FOLLOWED BY EXECUTION
LESSENED TO
LIFE IMPRISONMENT
SPMETIMES
NEED?
PRESRVE
LAW
ORDER
DETER CRIME
COSTS LESS
THAN LIFE IMPRISONMENT
HONORS VICTIM
CONSOLE GRIEVING FAMILIES
ENSURE
NO FUTURE CRIME
BY THE CRIMINAL
MURDER & RAPE
SERIOUS CRIME
NEED SERIOUS PUNISHMENT
PREVENT TERRORISM
AGAINST
NO EVIDENCE
DEATH PENALTY
REDUCING CRIME
VIOLATES
RIGH TO LIFE
ARTICLE 21
GOVT
ARBITRRY POWER
ARTICLE 21
SOCIAL INJUSTICE
TARGETS PEOPLE
CAN'T AFFPORD
GOOD LAWERS
LIFETIME JAIL SENTENCE
MORE SEVERE
INHUMANE & BARBARIC
AGGRAVATE
HATE & REVENGE
IN SOCIETY
VLOLATES
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT LAWS
WHAT IF?
INNOCENT PERSON
EXECUTED
NO UNIFORM & FAIR PRINCIPLE
REFORMATIVE JUSTICE
NOT POSSBLE
REDUCES
VICTIM'S CHANCE FOR SURVIVAL
RAPISTS-REVENGE
DP SOLUTION TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE
PATRIARCHAL
DISCRIMINATORY
AROUND 76% DEATH ROW PRISONERS
POOR
SC/ST
REIGIOUS MINORITIES
WHEN CASES MOVE UP ON UPPER LEVELS OF COURT
GENERAL CATEGORY
LESS
SC/ST
EVOLUTION-INDIA
EARLY 1950S
DEATH PENALTY
NORMAL PUNISHMENT
1955
CHOICE TO SESSIONS JUDGES
AWARD
EITHER
CAPITAL PUSHMENT
LIFE IMPRSINMENT
FOR
MURDER
1973
CRPC AMENDED-
SESSIONS JUDGE
GIVE SPECIA REASONS
IF DEODED
1980
BACHAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
SC RULING
DEATH PENALTY
RAREST OF RARE CASES
1983
MACHHI SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
EXCEPTIONS TO
DEATH PENALTY WHEN
BRUTAL MURDER
DEGINERATE & MEAN MURDER
ENORMOUS CRIME
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS
ARTICLE 21
RIGHT TO LIFE
AGANST BOTH
EXECUTIVE ACTIONS
LEGISIATIVE ACTIONS
ARTICLE 72
PRESIDENT'S POWER
PARDON DEATH SENTENCE
JUDICIAL REVIEW
IF DECISION
ARINTRARY
IRRATION
DISCRIMAIATORY
setting up and dismantling of displays
RIGHT TO APPEAL
IN SC
ON THE HC VERDICT
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IMPOSE
ON REVERSAL OF
ACQUITTAL ORDER
WAY FORARD
ADDRESS ISUES
WAHT
LOW CONVICTION RATE
INSENSITIVE AGENCIES
DELAY IN POLICE ACTION
HOW
REFORMS
POUCE
AUDICIARY
REGABILTATE AND EMPOWER
RAPE SURVIVORS
MORE FAST TRACK
MORE I STOP CRISIS CENTRES
WINESS PROTECTION
MORE COMPENATION
OVERHAUL CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
IMPROVE SEX RATIO
ABOLISH DEATH PENALTY
Death Panelty In India Pros and Cons
18
CAPITAL
PUNISHMENT
WHAT
LEGALLY KILLING
DEATH PENALTY
NOT ALWAYS
LESSENED TO
NEED?
PRESRVE
DETER CRIME
COSTS LESS
HONORS VICTIM
CONSOLE GRIEVING FAMILIES
AGAINST
EVOLUTION-INDIA
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS
WAY FORARD
NO EVIDENCE
VIOLATES
GOVT
SOCIAL INJUSTICE
LIFETIME JAIL SENTENCE
INHUMANE & BARBARIC
EARLY 1950S
1955
1973
ARTICLE 21
ARTICLE 72
setting up and dismantling of displays
ADDRESS ISUES
IMPROVE SEX RATIO
ABOLISH DEATH PENALTY
WAHT
HOW
LOW CONVICTION RATE
INSENSITIVE AGENCIES
DELAY IN POLICE ACTION
REFORMS
MORE FAST TRACK
MORE I STOP CRISIS CENTRES
WINESS PROTECTION
MORE COMPENATION
OVERHAUL CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
POUCE
AUDICIARY
REGABILTATE AND EMPOWER
RAPE SURVIVORS
PERSON-SERIOUS CRIME
LIFE IMPRISONMENT
SPMETIMES
FOLLOWED BY EXECUTION
LAW
ORDER
THAN LIFE IMPRISONMENT
ENSURE
MURDER & RAPE
PREVENT TERRORISM
NO FUTURE CRIME
BY THE CRIMINAL
SERIOUS CRIME
NEED SERIOUS PUNISHMENT
DEATH PENALTY
REDUCING CRIME
RIGH TO LIFE
ARTICLE 21
ARBITRRY POWER
ARTICLE 21
TARGETS PEOPLE
CAN'T AFFPORD
MORE SEVERE
GOOD LAWERS
AGGRAVATE
VLOLATES
WHAT IF?
NO UNIFORM & FAIR PRINCIPLE
REFORMATIVE JUSTICE
HATE & REVENGE
IN SOCIETY
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT LAWS
INNOCENT PERSON
EXECUTED
REDUCES
DP SOLUTION TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE
DISCRIMINATORY
NOT POSSBLE
VICTIM'S CHANCE FOR SURVIVAL
RAPISTS-REVENGE
PATRIARCHAL
AROUND 76% DEATH ROW PRISONERS
WHEN CASES MOVE UP ON UPPER LEVELS OF COURT
GENERAL CATEGORY
SC/ST
LESS
POOR
SC/ST
REIGIOUS MINORITIES
DEATH PENALTY
NORMAL PUNISHMENT
CHOICE TO SESSIONS JUDGES
AWARD
EITHER
FOR
MURDER
CAPITAL PUSHMENT
LIFE IMPRSINMENT
CRPC AMENDED-
SESSIONS JUDGE
GIVE SPECIA REASONS
IF DEODED
1980
1983
BACHAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
SC RULING
DEATH PENALTY
RAREST OF RARE CASES
MACHHI SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
EXCEPTIONS TO
DEATH PENALTY WHEN
BRUTAL MURDER
DEGINERATE & MEAN MURDER
ENORMOUS CRIME
RIGHT TO LIFE
AGANST BOTH
EXECUTIVE ACTIONS
LEGISIATIVE ACTIONS
PRESIDENT'S POWER
JUDICIAL REVIEW
IF DECISION
PARDON DEATH SENTENCE
ARINTRARY
IRRATION
DISCRIMAIATORY
RIGHT TO APPEAL
IN SC
ON THE HC VERDICT
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IMPOSE
ON REVERSAL OF
ACQUITTAL ORDER
CAPITALPUNISHMENT
WHAT
LEGALLY KILLING
PERSON-SERIOUS CRIME
DEATH PENALTY
NOT ALWAYS
FOLLOWED BY EXECUTION
LESSENED TO
LIFE IMPRISONMENT
SPMETIMES
NEED?
PRESRVE
LAW
ORDER
DETER CRIME
COSTS LESS
THAN LIFE IMPRISONMENT
HONORS VICTIM
CONSOLE GRIEVING FAMILIES
ENSURE
NO FUTURE CRIME
BY THE CRIMINAL
MURDER & RAPE
SERIOUS CRIME
NEED SERIOUS PUNISHMENT
PREVENT TERRORISM
AGAINST
NO EVIDENCE
DEATH PENALTY
REDUCING CRIME
VIOLATES
RIGH TO LIFE
ARTICLE 21
GOVT
ARBITRRY POWER
ARTICLE 21
SOCIAL INJUSTICE
TARGETS PEOPLE
CAN'T AFFPORD
GOOD LAWERS
LIFETIME JAIL SENTENCE
MORE SEVERE
INHUMANE & BARBARIC
AGGRAVATE
HATE & REVENGE
IN SOCIETY
VLOLATES
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT LAWS
WHAT IF?
INNOCENT PERSON
EXECUTED
NO UNIFORM & FAIR PRINCIPLE
REFORMATIVE JUSTICE
NOT POSSBLE
REDUCES
VICTIM'S CHANCE FOR SURVIVAL
RAPISTS-REVENGE
DP SOLUTION TO SEXUAL VIOLENCE
PATRIARCHAL
DISCRIMINATORY
AROUND 76% DEATH ROW PRISONERS
POOR
SC/ST
REIGIOUS MINORITIES
WHEN CASES MOVE UP ON UPPER LEVELS OF COURT
GENERAL CATEGORY
LESS
SC/ST
EVOLUTION-INDIA
EARLY 1950S
DEATH PENALTY
NORMAL PUNISHMENT
1955
CHOICE TO SESSIONS JUDGES
AWARD
EITHER
CAPITAL PUSHMENT
LIFE IMPRSINMENT
FOR
MURDER
1973
CRPC AMENDED-
SESSIONS JUDGE
GIVE SPECIA REASONS
IF DEODED
1980
BACHAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
SC RULING
DEATH PENALTY
RAREST OF RARE CASES
1983
MACHHI SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB CASE
EXCEPTIONS TO
DEATH PENALTY WHEN
BRUTAL MURDER
DEGINERATE & MEAN MURDER
ENORMOUS CRIME
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS
ARTICLE 21
RIGHT TO LIFE
AGANST BOTH
EXECUTIVE ACTIONS
LEGISIATIVE ACTIONS
ARTICLE 72
PRESIDENT'S POWER
PARDON DEATH SENTENCE
JUDICIAL REVIEW
IF DECISION
ARINTRARY
IRRATION
DISCRIMAIATORY
setting up and dismantling of displays
RIGHT TO APPEAL
IN SC
ON THE HC VERDICT
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IMPOSE
ON REVERSAL OF
ACQUITTAL ORDER
WAY FORARD
ADDRESS ISUES
WAHT
LOW CONVICTION RATE
INSENSITIVE AGENCIES
DELAY IN POLICE ACTION
HOW
REFORMS
POUCE
AUDICIARY
REGABILTATE AND EMPOWER
RAPE SURVIVORS
MORE FAST TRACK
MORE I STOP CRISIS CENTRES
WINESS PROTECTION
MORE COMPENATION
OVERHAUL CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES
IMPROVE SEX RATIO
ABOLISH DEATH PENALTY
Mind Map
Outline
1
Page-1
1
Page-1
This work was published by EdrawMind user Community Helper and does not
represent the position of Edraw Software.