MindMap Gallery inductive reasoning
A mind map about inductive reasoning.
Edited at 2020-09-08 01:18:23The human body is the physical structure of a human being. It is a complex and intricate system composed of various organs, tissues, and cells, working together to support life and enable various functions. In the human body, there are ten primary body systems. The body system shows all the ten body systems and their contribution to the maintenance of a healthy human body.
This electromagnetic waves concept map will clear out any misinformation and problem the students might have regarding the electromagnetic waves.
The concept map of the immune system is the types of the immune system, how it is further branched out, and what every cell is supposed to do for a better understanding and learning.
The human body is the physical structure of a human being. It is a complex and intricate system composed of various organs, tissues, and cells, working together to support life and enable various functions. In the human body, there are ten primary body systems. The body system shows all the ten body systems and their contribution to the maintenance of a healthy human body.
This electromagnetic waves concept map will clear out any misinformation and problem the students might have regarding the electromagnetic waves.
The concept map of the immune system is the types of the immune system, how it is further branched out, and what every cell is supposed to do for a better understanding and learning.
Inductive Reasoning
Empirical Generalization
Is the sample Know?
Inductive argument=persuasive=sample population explicitly know and clear identified.
Is the sample Sufficient?
Enough large to give an accurate sense of the group as a whole.
Is the sample Representative?
The sample has to be similar to the large group in terms of relevant qualities.
Fallacies
Fallacies of False Generalization
Hasty Generalization
This happen when the samples are not large enough and/or not representative to conclude.
Sweeping Generalization
Focuses on difficulties in the process of interpreting.
False Dilemma
Chouse between two extreme alternative without being able to consider additional options.
General conclusion based on a limited number of examples and then apply this conclusion to others examples.
Causal Fallacies
Questionable Cause
Occurs when someone presents a casual relationship for which no real evidence exist
Misidentification of the cause
Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
After it, therefore because of it. Two thing Occur close together on time, we assume that one caused the other.
Slippery Slope
asserts that one undesirable action will inevitable lead to a worse action.
Unsound arguments that are often persuasive and logical. Appeal to emotions and prejudices.
Fallacies of Relevance
Appeal to Authority
Appeals to authorities who are not qualified to give an expert opinion.
Appeal to Tradition
Asserting that a practice or way of thinking is "better" or "right", simply because it is older, traditional, or has "always been done that way."
Bandwagon
The uncritical acceptance of others' opinions because "everyone believes it" or because one fears being left behind as a popular trens moves forward.
Appeal to Pity
An appeal designed to make us feel sorry for the person involved and agree with the conclusion out of sympathy.
Appeal to Fear
Appealing to the threat of a negative.
Appeal to Flattery
Appealing to vanity.
Special Pleading
Make a special exception, without sound justification, to the reasonable application of standards, principles, or expectations.
Appeal to Ignorance
A conclusion that claims to be true unless it can be disproved.
Begging The Question
A conclusion that simply assumes to be true without providing relevant evidence.
Straw Man
Attacking or distorting a claim or position by creating an exaggerated or trivialized version of it.
Red Herring
Introducing an irrelevant topic in order to divert attention from the original issue or claim being discussed.
Appeal to Personal Attack
ignoring the issue of the argument and focusing instead on the personal qualities of the person making the argument.
Two Wrongs Make a Right
attempts to justify a morally questionable action by arguing is a response to another wrong action, either real or imagined. Two wrong= a right.
Ad Hominem
Ignoring the issue of the argument and focusing instead on discrediting or criticizing the source.
Casual Reasoning
Scientific Method
Identify an event or a relationship between events to be investigated
Gather information about the event
Locating any relevant info to help solve the problem
Develop a hypothesis or theory to explain what is happening.
Hypothesis: a possible explanation of what has happen.
Explanatory Power
Economy
Predictive Power
Test the hypothesis or theory through experimentation
Evaluate the hypothesis or theory based on experimental results
Cause-to-Effect Experiments(with Intervention)
Cause-to-Effect Experiments(without Intervention)
Effect-to-Cause Experiments
Woks on the assumption that the world is constructed in a complex web of casual relationships that can be discovered through systematic investigation.