MindMap Gallery joint crime
This is a mind map about joint crime. Joint crime refers to two or more people committing a deliberate crime together. It is suitable for exam review!
Edited at 2024-04-19 21:55:46Mappa mentale per il piano di inserimento dei nuovi dipendenti nella prima settimana. Strutturata per giorni: Giorno 1 – benvenuto, configurazione strumenti, presentazione team. Secondo giorno – formazione su policy aziendali e obiettivi del ruolo. Terzo giorno – affiancamento e primi task guidati. Il quarto giorno – riunioni con dipartimenti chiave e feedback intermedio. Il quinto giorno – revisione settimanale, definizione obiettivi a breve termine e integrazione culturale.
Mappa mentale per l’analisi della formazione francese ai Mondiali 2026. Punti chiave: attacco stellare guidato da Mbappé, con triplice minaccia (profondità, taglio, sponda). Criticità: centrocampo poco creativo – la costruzione offensiva dipende dagli attaccanti che arretrano. Difesa solida (Upamecano, Saliba, Koundé). Portiere Maignan. Variabili: gestione infortuni e condizione fisica dei big. Ideale per scout, giornalisti e tifosi.
Mappa mentale per l’analisi della formazione francese ai Mondiali 2026. Punti chiave: attacco stellare guidato da Mbappé, con triplice minaccia (profondità, taglio, sponda). Criticità: centrocampo poco creativo – la costruzione offensiva dipende dagli attaccanti che arretrano. Difesa solida (Upamecano, Saliba, Koundé). Portiere Maignan. Variabili: gestione infortuni e condizione fisica dei big. Ideale per scout, giornalisti e tifosi.
Mappa mentale per il piano di inserimento dei nuovi dipendenti nella prima settimana. Strutturata per giorni: Giorno 1 – benvenuto, configurazione strumenti, presentazione team. Secondo giorno – formazione su policy aziendali e obiettivi del ruolo. Terzo giorno – affiancamento e primi task guidati. Il quarto giorno – riunioni con dipartimenti chiave e feedback intermedio. Il quinto giorno – revisione settimanale, definizione obiettivi a breve termine e integrazione culturale.
Mappa mentale per l’analisi della formazione francese ai Mondiali 2026. Punti chiave: attacco stellare guidato da Mbappé, con triplice minaccia (profondità, taglio, sponda). Criticità: centrocampo poco creativo – la costruzione offensiva dipende dagli attaccanti che arretrano. Difesa solida (Upamecano, Saliba, Koundé). Portiere Maignan. Variabili: gestione infortuni e condizione fisica dei big. Ideale per scout, giornalisti e tifosi.
Mappa mentale per l’analisi della formazione francese ai Mondiali 2026. Punti chiave: attacco stellare guidato da Mbappé, con triplice minaccia (profondità, taglio, sponda). Criticità: centrocampo poco creativo – la costruzione offensiva dipende dagli attaccanti che arretrano. Difesa solida (Upamecano, Saliba, Koundé). Portiere Maignan. Variabili: gestione infortuni e condizione fisica dei big. Ideale per scout, giornalisti e tifosi.
joint crime
Classification of joint crimes
joint crime
principal offender
In terms of quantity, they are divided into: single principal offender/joint principal offender
In terms of method, it is divided into: direct principal offender/indirect principal offender
accomplice
Criminal boss
accomplice
Relationship between principal and accomplice
accomplice affiliation
The independence of accomplices believes that the conviction of instigators and helpers should be judged independently, without considering whether the perpetrators committed a crime
Subordination of accomplices (official position of the Legal Examination): The perpetrator’s crime is a prerequisite for the instigator and helper to commit the crime.
Subordinate attributes of criminal forms: 1. The principal offender did not commit the crime, and the accomplice is not guilty. 2. When the principal offender is in the preparation stage, the crime is suspended; the accomplice constitutes preparation for the crime. 3. The principal offender is in the preparatory stage, preparing to commit a crime; the accomplice constitutes preparation for a crime 4. When the principal offender is in the execution stage, the crime is suspended; the accomplice constitutes an attempted crime. 5. The principal offender attempted the crime during the execution stage; the accomplice constituted an attempted crime. 6. When the principal offender is in the execution stage, the crime is completed; the accomplice constitutes the completion of the crime.
The nature of joint crime
Substantive principle: The violation of the law is together and the responsibility is independent. Joint crime is actually a special phenomenon of the objective class. It is actually only the task of the objective class to judge whether two people constitute a joint crime.
"Sameness" of form: Let's create illegal facts together
The theory of common crime: The theory of complete common crime requires complete consistency between subjectivity and objectivity, and the viewpoint has been eliminated. The theory of partial joint crime only requires that two people have some similarities. Not required to be convicted of the same crime
Theory of common behavior (majority): As long as the perpetrators jointly create illegal facts and the illegality is common, it is a joint crime. In particular, it does not require that the elements of the subjective class remain the same, nor does it require that the same crime be convicted.
joint offender
Objective illegal class: "Partial implementation, full responsibility" principle,
Subjective responsibility class: 1. No requirement for age of responsibility 2. No requirement for responsibility ability 3. There is no requirement for intentionality or negligence.
Part of the theory of joint crime: two people are jointly guilty, subjectively it must be intentional and not negligent. Negligent crimes are not enough to be jointly culpable, and we do not agree with "negligent joint culprits"
Theory of common conduct (majority theory): The establishment of joint perpetrators only requires a connection of intention in the objective illegal class. As for the subjective responsibility class, the responsibility is independent, that is, the joint principal perpetrators agree with the negligence.
indirect culprit
objective class
coercive means
Forcing others to commit a crime
Forcing the victim to commit self-destructive behavior
deception
Deceiving others and taking advantage of others' mistakes, for example, a doctor gives a poisonous needle to a nurse, and the nurse uses it on the patient without checking based on trust.
To deceive others and take advantage of others' intentional behavior. For example, A asks B to hit the screen. In fact, C is behind the screen and wants B to beat C to death.
Deceiving the victim into committing self-destructive behavior
Supervisory level: It must be intentional, and the indirect principal offense is instigating, exploiting, and dominating
Criminal boss
objective illegal class
The conditions for establishing an abettor: the abetment behavior causes the principal offender’s illegal behavior
If another person already has the intention to commit a certain crime, instigating him to commit the crime does not constitute an instigator, because there is no relationship between causing and being caused.
Others already have the intention to commit a misdemeanor and instigate others to commit a felony, which constitutes an instigator of a felony
If someone already has the intention to commit a felony, instigating others to commit a misdemeanor of the same nature does not constitute an instigator because the risk to legal interests is reduced.
Someone who already has the intention to commit a felony and instigates others to commit a misdemeanor of a different nature constitutes an instigator of the misdemeanor crime.
Accomplished conditions for instigating offenders: the instigating behavior causes the illegal consequences of the principal offender
Subjective responsibility level: requires subjective intentionality
Caused by negligence, does not constitute an instigator
Intentional instigation cannot be committed and does not constitute instigation. For example, A gives B an empty gun and asks B to shoot C who is far away.
accomplice
objective illegal class
Conditions for establishment: Helping behavior promotes the principal offender to commit illegal acts
Accomplished condition: Helping behavior promotes the principal offender to create illegal results
Psychological help: psychological promotion for the principal offender, such as lookout
Subjective responsibility class: Requires subjective intention to help
Neutral helping behavior: 1. Whether subjectively you know that the other party is committing a crime; 2. Whether the objective behavior has played a substantial and urgent role in promoting the other party's crime.
Participation time in joint crime
Halfway Involved: Inherited Co-Crime
Exit midway: separation from accomplice relationship, withdrawal requirements
Instigate the offender: give up the intention to commit the crime
Helping offenders: eliminating physical and psychological contributions
Co-offender: In the preparatory stage, physical and psychological contributions must be eliminated; in the execution stage, the other party must be effectively prevented from committing the crime.
Special issues of joint crime
One-sided (unilateral) joint crime
One-sided help. For example, A wanted to kill C, but saw B chasing C, and secretly set up a rope to trip C (slightly injured). B successfully killed C and did not know that A helped him.
Definitely say: A constitutes B's one-sided accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide, and the crime here is one-sided.
Negative theory: A does not constitute an accomplice, and the opponent is dealt with separately, but A only caused minor injuries to C, which does not constitute a crime. This statement is unreasonable, so I turned to the affirmative statement.
Implemented comprehensively. A learned that B wanted to rape C, so he knocked C unconscious in advance and then exited. B successfully raped the woman, but did not know that it was A who knocked the woman unconscious.
Definitely (majority): 1. A has the awareness to participate in B's crime and should be responsible for B's illegal facts. Combined with his own violent behavior, he constitutes the one-sided perpetrator (principal offender) of B's crime of rape. 2. B constitutes a separate crime of rape.
Negative theory (minority): 1. A does not constitute a partial perpetrator of B's crime of rape, but constitutes a separate crime of intentional injury, but A constitutes a partial accomplice of B's crime of rape. A is a one-sided accomplice who triggers the crime of intentional injury and rape at the same time. Imagine competing and choosing one. 2. B constitutes a separate crime of rape
Joint crime and status offender
1. Among real identity criminals, only those with identity are qualified to constitute execution offenders, and those without identity can only constitute accomplices (teachers or gangsters) 2. A person with an identity must constitute an execution offender, and the execution act must be carried out 3. Analysis path: Analyze each person separately. If two crimes are committed at the same time, imagine competing and choosing one.
Joint crime and crime of omission: the act of omission as an obligor constitutes an accomplice crime if not instigated/aided by the obligor; the act committed by someone other than the obligor and the assistance of the omission of the obligor constitutes an accessory crime.
The judgment standard for joint crime and excessive execution is to see whether it exceeds the scope of common intention. Exceeding responsibility.
Common crime and misunderstanding
Common culprit: first determine the type of cognitive error and then analyze it
Instigating or assisting the offender. Principal offender: first determine the type of cognitive error and then analyze it.
Accomplices become victims: analysis of accomplices one by one
Do you admit being a co-culprit in negligence? For example, A and B discuss shooting a wild boar together and accidentally kill passerby C. There is only one fatal bullet in C's body. It is impossible to find out who shot it.