Structural thinking emphasizes summarizing first and then dividing: first the framework and then the details, first the summary and then the specifics, first the conclusion and then the reasons, and first the important before the minor. It is the embodiment of top-down expression.

1. Only by complying with the above system can the effect of expression be guaranteed.

2. Only conclusions that are supported by reasons are convincing.

3. The characteristics of the above unified system meet the practical requirements

1. I have three suggestions on this issue - classification can make communication more efficient.

This matter can be considered from the following aspects - classification makes thinking more efficient

1. Look for those opinions - personal opinions are different from facts

2. Confirm that point of view is the conclusion

3. Find the reasons that support the conclusion--a reason is first and foremost a point of view, explaining why the conclusion is recognized.

4. What facts can you see if you put on a white hat? -----White hat stands for information, facts and figures

1. Set the scenario before confirming the goal

2. The more specific the scene, the more accurate the content will be.

ABCD goal method

1. There are three basic principles for packaging themes: simplicity, accuracy, and benefits (from the perspective of the other party)

2. Use the topic selection matrix to select the optimal topic

The main function of the preface is to remind the other party to care about a question before the central idea is revealed, thereby arousing the other party's interest, and the answer to this question is the central idea you want to express. Can be used to tell stories

1. Change to a thinking mode centered on the needs of the other party

2. Ensure issues are fully covered through 5W2H

3. An easy way to master 2W1H

4. From 2W1H to 1--2--3 simple structural thinking model

1. Your answer must be a conclusion

2. Conclusions are needed at each level

Answers require “new medicine in old bottles”

Method 1: Look for commonalities and draw conclusions through common points.

Method 2: Scenario imagination, what would you say to the other person when face to face?

Method 3: Make good use of modifications and come up with conclusions that can touch people's hearts.

1. Determine the theme

2. Diverge based on the theme and think as much as possible

3. Aggregate and condense the things you have thought about into a useful result.

1. Standard formula is the foundation of human rational thinking

Standard expressions make expressions more convincing

1. Common expressions are really common

2. Common expressions are really practical

3. Pay attention to distinguishing phenomenon and cause as two different concepts.

Each group of ideas must completely follow the structure

1. Classification conforms to human thinking habits and makes implicit experiences explicit.

2. Clarify the use of the three classification methods

Choose a classification method for each group of ideas

1. Develop the habit of MECE

2. Confirm whether the ideas in each group comply with the MECE principle

3. Master the easy way to create MECE: 2 by 2 matrix

4. Can use existing structures to think and analyze

Advantages: 1. Prove the necessity of the conclusion; 2. Extremely effective for listeners with a refusal mentality.

Disadvantages: 1. If the audience has objections to the premise, the entire argument will be ineffective; 2. The audience has to remember a lot of information before hearing the conclusion.

When the other party focuses on solutions, it is more suitable to use the inductive method: Advantages: 1. It is easy to remember the key points, and the key points in the three aspects of 123 are very clear; 2. If one point is denied, the remaining points are still persuasive.

1. Comply with the four basic characteristics of structural thinking ability

2. Use images to demonstrate visually