MindMap Gallery Western Sociological Theory (Key Edition)
This is a mind map about Western sociological theory (key edition), which summarizes contemporary sociological theory, modern sociological theory, classical sociological theory, etc.
Edited at 2024-01-18 10:34:27This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
Western Sociological Theory (Key Edition)
contemporary sociological theory
Habermas
The rational basis of linguistic behavior
universal pragmatics
Classification of human social behavior
The basis of effectiveness of speech
universal conditions of possible understanding that underlie the validity of utterances
Any person in a communicative activity who performs any speech act must meet certain general validity requirements and it is assumed that they can be verified
Specifically include
truth of statement
Describe the object of the statement truthfully
Essence is the principle of objectivity in scientific cognitive activities
legitimacy of speech
Both the speaker and the listener must evaluate the surroundings fairly Objects as a prerequisite for communication
Evaluative principles that embody moral judgment and ethical principles
is the principle of good in the realm of morality and ethics
sincerity of expression
The speaker expresses the inner world to the listener in order to achieve emotional integration and shared experience.
comprehensibility of expression
Newly added based on the characteristics of verbal communication
The relationship between the principle of validity of speech (or the principle of communicative rationality) and scientific principles (truth), ethical principles (goodness) and aesthetic principles (beauty) is the relationship between the whole and the parts, and the relationship between the universal and the individual.
Why are these principles proposed?
Using it to measure reality not only reveals the ineffectiveness of the actual verbal communication process, but also leads to the revolutionary conclusion that these principles must be used to change reality
He actually made a very critical ideal request
Although the foundation of speech effectiveness revealed by Hamas is defined by him as real in daily speech communication, the existence of these four effectiveness principles is speech practice that has not been suppressed and distorted.
Under the constraints of ideology and other factors, unrepressed speech practice is an ideal state, and the actual process of speech practice is a state of suppression and distortion. The four principles of effective speech are difficult to exist in it.
communicative rationality
Habermas's discussion on the basis of effectiveness of speech is a profound manifestation of his promotion of social rationalization.
Agree with Weber's conclusion that the essence of modern social development and social modernization is rationalization, but he disagrees with Weber's reduction of rationalization to instrumental rationalization only.
Instrumental rationality can solve people's understanding and proof of the natural world and achieve effective management and control of society, but it cannot solve problems in interpersonal relationships. Instrumental rationality faces the external world of objects, while interpersonal relationships unfold the world of meaning at the level of subjective will, which requires a new rational principle.
The four principles that ensure the effectiveness of speech are the rational principles for effective communication relationships, which can also be called communicative rationality. Acting according to them, speech can achieve effective communication and form a consensus based on mutual understanding.
The debate between modernity and postmodernity
Modernity according to Habermas
Modernity is a spiritual direction
It points to human progress, happiness, freedom and harmony, and advocates the development of science, promotion of culture and promotion of Enter production to achieve this complete spiritual direction;
Modernity is a way of thinking or a principle of thought
It firmly believes in the rational ability of human beings and the universality and validity of logical thinking principles, Emphasis on the constructive guiding role of theoretical thinking in reality
Modernity is the code of conduct
It advocates that human behavior should be carried out in accordance with rational principles and value goals, and that different behavior should be followed in different fields of behavior. same rational principles and value goals. Truth, goodness and beauty are different norms and ultimate goals of social actions and communication behaviors at different levels
Modernity is a dynamic concept
It has no definite time period, and its connotation continues to change with the changes of the times. Humanity should be prepared for this unfinished business Keep fighting for your career.
Criticism of the Right
Criticized the view of Bell and others that modernity is outdated and leads to social alienation
He believes that the problems of modern society are not due to the obsolescence of the spirit of modernity, but to the abandonment of the principles of modernity that pursue integrity and harmony.
Therefore, not only must modernity not be abandoned, but complete modernity must be restored
Criticism of the Left
Criticized Foucault, Lyotard and other French post-structuralists’ overemphasis on social differences, ruptures and differentiation, and believed that this understanding of society was untenable
There are commonalities in differences, and universality in particularities.
Habermas's proposition
Modernity is not obsolete. The modernization cause since the Enlightenment is fundamentally positive and viable.
Modernity has shortcomings, but these shortcomings can be corrected through a new rationalization - the construction of communicative rationality. Modernity should not be denied with novel and weird words
neofunctionalism
Why neofunctionalism
Critiques of Structural Functionalism from Conflict Theory, Exchange Theory, and Phenomenological Sociology
conflict theory
The system is not necessarily in equilibrium
critical theory
Don’t be too optimistic about modern society and maintain a certain degree of criticality
Symbolic interactionism, dramatism
The contingency and creativity of "action"
Alexander et al.
Functionalism "has the basic qualities needed to be a successful sociological theory"
It is the most appropriate basis for a new synthesis of sociological theory, even "the only feasible basis".
Six Characteristics of “Functionalism” According to Alexander
Provides a general picture of the interrelationships between parts of society in a descriptive rather than prescriptive sense
Pay attention not only to structure but also to action, not only to the practicality and means of action, but also to the expressiveness with purpose
Pay attention to the variation process of social integration and social control
The distinction between given personality, culture and society is necessary for social structure, and the tension generated by their interpenetration is a constant source of change and control
Differentiation is the main form of social change
Emphasis on the independence of conceptualization and theorizing
Correction to Parsons
social action
Pa
Trying to establish a general action theoretical framework through multi-faceted synthesis, it is proposed that action is an action process with multi-faceted attributes including means, purposes, norms, conditions, subjective efforts and other elements.
He tends to emphasize the norm-bound aspect of action. The significance of the actor's subjective efforts to action is ignored. The actor becomes a puppet at the mercy of the outside world, a black box with unknown internal subjective status.
This normative action process with unknown internal status was logically explained by Parsons as a simple role execution process guided by social norms and expectations through socialization.
Asia
Action problems proceed along two basic dimensions
explain
Including the two processes of typing and invention
plan
minimize costs
maximize rewards
defect
Still attach great importance to the coercion of the environment on action
"To understand contingency is to understand that it must tend to force"
Social Structure
old
Society can be described as an organic whole composed of internal parts and levels that are interconnected and mutually restrictive.
Most of them study social structure as an objective reality that is completely independent and beyond individual actions, and do not pay attention to the interaction between social action and social structure.
Strive to conduct research similar to traditional natural sciences
In fact, more emphasis is placed on the structural nature of action (that is, the aspect of action that is restricted by its structure), and the functional characteristics of the action structure (the action system is a "harmonious" system)
new
It distinguishes the two aspects of action and the environment of action, and points out that the AGIL four-function analysis model cannot be used to analyze the action itself, but should be used to analyze the environment of the action, which itself is also affected by the action and its consequences. It is the prerequisite for action and the product of specific action.
Introducing the concepts of interest groups, interest groups and their structures, and group conflicts in conflict theory into Parsons' framework
Different functional parts of the social system are also social groups with different interests and goals. While performing social functions, they are also pursuing their own interests and working hard to control more power and resources.
Social structure is not only a functional relationship structure, but also an interest relationship structure. The process of social structure-function differentiation is also the process of social class or stratum differentiation.
Social integration and operation must have some kind of coercion, and how to occupy a better (or even dominant) position in this coercive society is one of the action goals of various interest groups.
social process
Pa
It is believed that the social operation process is a coordinated, desirable, balanced and "harmonious" process
A process in which all members of a social system coordinate and cooperate with each other and work together to meet various functional needs of society under the influence of some commonly recognized social consciousness, social norms and social integration mechanisms.
How do countless isolated individual actions construct this coordinated and balanced process?
Two basic social mechanisms
The "socialization" of individuals transforms individuals into "social roles" that are consistent with social expectations
Social control mechanism prevents and corrects divergent behaviors, makes divergent actors "normal" and maintains social order.
This explanation highlights the integrity and normative nature of the social process and ignores the initiative and interest of individual actions and the conflictual nature of the social process.
new
On the basis of distinguishing between action and action environment, Alexander pointed out that the social environment (systems) only defines a scope of change and choice for the actor's action, and the action choices made by the actor will in turn affect the entire society. changes in environment
But more emphasis is placed on the constraining role of social environment in behavior
Munk proposed four types of micro-interaction: market exchange, political decision-making, community interaction, and rational discussion. It is believed that these four micro-interaction processes form the basis of the entire social process
Two aspects of nature
They must start from certain external premises. And these "external premises" exist before interaction and have given and macrostructural characteristics. (i.e. actions are constrained by existing structures)
The results of each micro-interaction also become part of the "external prerequisites" for future subsequent interactions. Micro-actions therefore also have dynamic effects on the structures in which they are embedded. (reflexivity of action to structure sexual influence)
There is interaction and mutual influence between micro-interaction and the macro-structure as its premise.
Social Changes
PA (differentiation theory)
The basic form of social change is social differentiation. The basic trend of social change is the continuous evolution from simple structures with overlapping functions to complex structures with concrete and specialized functions.
The basic driving force for social differentiation is the functional needs of society and the resulting structural pressures
The result of social differentiation is to continuously improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the social system
The process of social differentiation includes differentiation, adaptive growth, inclusion and value summary, etc.
criticize
Too empty and abstract, lacking experience and historical research
The explanation of the dynamics of social change is too simple and ignores the impact of power and conflict on change.
It is questionable that differentiation will inevitably lead to improvements in efficiency and effectiveness.
Too optimistic about modern social conditions and has conservative tendencies
new
Enrich the empirical dimensions and scope of application of differentiation theoretical models
On the premise of insisting that differentiation is the basic trend of social change, empirical research has pointed out that the actual operation of differentiation takes many forms and shapes.
"Reverse differentiation"
Rejecting the complexity of society and moving society towards a low level of differentiation, such as the "fundamentalist movement"
"unequal differentiation"
There are great differences in the speed and degree of differentiation in different fields. For example, during the Wanqing Westernization Movement in China
"Unbalanced differentiation"
There are large differences in the speed and degree of differentiation in different regions in the same field, such as the development levels of compulsory education and higher education in different countries.
"Frustrated differentiation"
A phenomenon in which a certain differentiation process is hindered
Go beyond simple systems theory or evolution-oriented explanations and enrich the explanatory perspective of social differentiation (incomplete)
Oppose Parsons’s simple understanding of differentiation as a “natural” response to the pressure of functional demands, nor as a social pursuit of effectiveness. society will not automatically and invariably embark on the path of functional differentiation
All of this is done by "organized people", that is, social groups, so the analytical perspective must be placed on social on the group
Distinguish the diversity of social differentiation results
Attempts to change the ideological image of differentiation theory
Introduce the "critical" perspective into differentiation analysis as much as possible, and strive to change the traditional impression of the differentiation community on differentiation theory and the entire functional analysis perspective of conservatism, outdated backwardness, and "value-free"
Trying to "prompt functionalism to turn to the left"
Giddens
Development of basic principles of structuration theory
structural duality
meaning
Structure serves both as an intermediary and the result of behaviors that are repeatedly organized by themselves; the structural characteristics of social systems are not external to actions, but are repeatedly involved in the production and reproduction of actions.
Under such a basic stance, the task of social theory is to examine how actions are structured under daily environmental conditions, and at the same time, how actions continue to reproduce such structured features through their own functions.
Continuity and Reflection in Practice
continuity of practice
The main field of social science research is neither the experience of individual actors nor any form of social totality, but various social practices that are orderly arranged in the spatial and temporal dimensions.
Although human social activities are not shaped by individual social actors, they are continuously created over and over again by them.
In the process of activities, the characteristics of human beings as actors are reflected, and at the same time, preconditions for these activities to continue to occur are created.
Therefore, it can be said that social activities are cyclical ("flow" of actions)
practical reflexivity
Action reflexivity, that is, reflective monitoring of action, refers to the purpose or intentionality of human behavior reflected in the actor's activity flow.
Human action occurs as a flow of action, and the basis of reflection lies in people's initial understanding of this flow of action. Always keep monitoring and expect others to keep the same monitoring at all times
Reflective monitoring is based on a dynamic rationalization process (rationalization of action), that is, qualified actors can easily provide reasons for their activities when asked during the course of action.
At the same time, there is also the motivation process (motivation), which is the process of providing motivation that is latent in action and promotes action.
The process of reflective regulation of action, rationalization and motivational stimulation, these three processes combined together constitute intentional human action (in Giddens's eyes).
routine daily life
Giddens believes that the daily life in which we live seems complicated on the surface, but apart from the various emergencies or special events that emerge, there are more routine experiences that we are blind to, precisely because of their Routines, people experience them in a self-evident way in their daily lives
Even though modern life seems to be full of freshness, due to the constraints imposed on people by various systems, people's daily behaviors are more uniformly arranged in a strict order that is not noticed by others.
In rational daily routine actions, people do not need motivations, or to be more precise, they do not need to explicitly think or even express their motivations in the form of words.
analysis of modernity
The formation of time and space in capitalist society
Three major driving forces for the development of modernity
The separation of time and space and its constant recombination, the society produced in this way Life has precise time and space "divisions"
Under the conditions of high modernity, time and space tend to become hollow.
Gradually separated from specific places and events, and gradually achieved a high degree of standardization and precision
Time and space are unified and coordinated on a global scale, and space is separated from specific places, so that what is absent increasingly determines what is present.
Directly related to the separation of time and space is the process of the gradual detachment of social systems (from locality)
That is, social relations break away from the local background of interaction and extend indefinitely across the span of time and space.
Two disengagement mechanisms essentially drive the development of modern social systems
Symbols
A universal medium of exchange that transcends specific individuals or groups, such as money, power, and language
expert system
Systems of professional skills that constitute the bulk of the natural and social environment we live in today
Knowledge has a continuous influence on the actions of individuals and groups, and social relations are constantly adjusted reflectively
Under the reflection of the concept of reflection, the so-called modernity means the prosperity of rationality, the growth of scientific knowledge means the growth of certainty, etc., which seemed self-evident, have been exposed as false.
In a highly reflective modern society, the interaction between social science and the objects it examines has not only been greatly enhanced in substance, but also has become more prominent in the extent to which it is recognized by people.
The concept of modernity itself has full sociological attributes
Multidimensional Analysis of Modernity Institutions
The institutional “plex” of modernity includes four dimensions
capitalism
Capital accumulation under labor and product competition
industrialism
The transformation of nature; the development of the “artificial environment”
military power
The control of violent means in the context of the industrialization of war
monitor
Information control and social management
Bring risk and trust into the discussion
risk
On the premise of consciously taking action, people have a clear estimation of future unexpected situations and make decisions accordingly.
In essence, many possible situations that affect human activities and bring risks have their roots in humans themselves, rather than God and nature as previously thought. This understanding is also modern. One of the characteristics
trust
In highly modern societies, it is more of a persistent state of not knowing anything about oneself in the face of symbols and expert systems (and the individuals who represent these abstract systems in concrete interaction situations) The operating rules have full confidence that the rules themselves are correct and can be relied upon. All that needs to be determined is whether the operating process complies with the rules.
optimistic realism
We cannot simply think that the rapid development of modernity is an erosion of the daily world and a suppression of intimate relationships.
There is a dialectical relationship between the globalization process of modernity and the transformation of intimate relationships in daily life
We cannot simply think that impersonal abstract systems have gradually replaced personal life. This view is still inseparable from the romantic and nostalgic sentiment of nostalgia.
Habermas’s so-called colonization of the life world by the system is a bit biased
Modern institutions do not just blindly embed themselves into the world of life. The nature of daily life is also constantly changing, changing the relationship between the two.
The so-called expertise is always relative. Laypeople are also constantly acquiring technical expertise through observation and contact with abstract systems. No one is an expert on everything, and no one knows everything.
This positive attitude is Giddens's basic stance on the status of highly developed modernity.
He therefore named the current social situation "high modernity" or "late modernity" to oppose the position of blindly advocating postmodernity.
Bourdieu
field and habitus
Habit
Habitus is a generative structure that shapes and organizes practice and produces history; but habitus itself It is also a product of history, a system of various productive schemata acquired by people.
Habitus is a kind of "history embodied in people", but because people have internalized it as a kind of "second nature", people have completely forgotten that it is a kind of history.
Habitus is an "internalization of externality". The principle of not being chosen on the basis of choice
field
definition
A network of objective relationships between positions whose existence and their decisive influence on the actors or institutions occupying particular positions are objectively determined
factors that determine these locations
The actual and potential situation of various positions within different types of power and capital distribution structures
The objective relationships between these positions (e.g., dominance, convergence, knot structural correspondence, etc.)
It is an operating space in which the effects of the field can be exerted
It is a contested space. The occupiers of various positions in the field use various strategies to ensure or improve their positions in the field, and constantly fight in the field.
The focus of the struggle in the field is who can impose a hierarchical principle that is most powerful for the capital he owns.
It also includes a kind of investment. When a person enters a certain field, he also enters a set of presuppositions connected to the field that he himself may not recognize.
vividly summarizes the basic characteristics of modern society
In a highly differentiated social world, the social world is composed of a large number of relatively autonomous social small worlds. These social small worlds are spaces of objective relationships with their own logic and necessity, which are also so-called fields.
In the process of investigating the field, special attention should be paid to the historical formation process of the field.
The relationship between habitus and field
constraint relationship
Field type shapes habitus, and habitus becomes the product of the inevitable attributes inherent in a certain field reflected in the body.
cognitive construction relationship
Habitus helps to construct the field into a world full of meaning, a world endowed with feelings and values, worthy of social actors' investment and experience.
Through the concepts of field and habitus, Bourdieu illustrates the dual existence of his structure. in the way
The various structures in the social world first exist in "primary objectivity", which refers to the distribution of various material resources and the influence of various social scarce items and values (that is, "capital") means
On the other hand, these structures also exist in the "secondary objectivity" reflected in various classification systems and mental schemas. They play the role of a symbolic model and are reflected in various practical activities of social actors. , such as thoughts, behaviors, emotional judgments, etc.
Precisely because it must consider both faces of structure at the same time, practice theory must carry out a double reading that integrates the perspectives of social physics and social phenomenology.
classical sociological theory
Durkheim
Social Solidarity and Social Division of Labor
social division of labor
What causes anomie?
It is not caused by division of labor
The normal division of labor itself "will never cause the dismemberment and collapse of society. The functions of its various parts can be fully linked to each other, tending to a balance, and forming a self-regulating mechanism."
division of labor
reason
"Social capacity" (i.e. the number and relationship of the population)
“Social density” (the frequency and intensity of interactions between members of a society)
The result of increasing competition for survival among people
Consequences of normal division of labor
Changed the basis of social solidarity and provided a new bond for social solidarity
Abnormal division of labor
Anomic division of labor
Resulting in society's lack of legal and moral constraints on personal behavior
New role norms resulting from division of labor are blurred
Cause members of society to lose the common beliefs and values that guide their actions
Lead to social anomie and hinder the development of organic solidarity
forced division of labor
Social inequalities that deviate from organic solidarity
Intensify social conflicts and threaten social order
Uncoordinated (inappropriate) division of labor
Two types of social solidarity
mechanical unity
based on personal similarity and social homogeneity
Through a strong "collective consciousness"
type of social bonding that links individuals
organic unity
Based on social division of labor and individual heterogeneity
through functional interdependence
type of social bonding that links individuals
The development process of human society is a process in which the advantages and status of mechanical solidarity continue to decline, while the advantages and status of organic solidarity continue to increase. The basic reason for this trend is the continuous development of the division of labor
Analysis of society based on social division of labor
Emphasize the contribution of normal division of labor to social unity
Emphasis on the negative impact of pathological division of labor on social order
Some of the shortcomings of capitalism are partly caused by abnormal division of labor. Abnormal division of labor will damage social unity. Heterogeneity and individualism brought about by normal division of labor will also threaten organic unity.
sociological research methods
Research object - social facts
concept
Constraints imposed on individuals from the outside that are ubiquitous and inherent in the society, regardless of how they manifest themselves on the individual, are called social facts.
Completed the separation of sociology and philosophy
Completed the separation of sociology and psychology
characteristic
externality
external to the individual
Mandatory
Having coercive power over individuals
universality
generally or widely present in society
methodological guidelines
Principles for observing social facts
Examine social facts as “things”
specific rules for observing social facts
Eliminate all preconceptions in scientific research
Defined by external common characteristics based on social facts
Try to use materials with enough objectivity to observe the external characteristics of things
Criteria for distinguishing normal social phenomena from pathological social phenomena
universality
criteria for classifying social types
According to the simplicity or complexity of social structure
Principles for interpreting social facts
Explain social facts with social facts
Social facts can be distinguished into facts as "social environment" (such as social capacity, social density, etc.) and other social facts
The most important point is to use social environment to explain various other social facts
A complete explanation of social facts must include causal examination and functional analysis
strategies and methods
The search for the causes and functions of a certain social fact should be sought from other social facts
Explain the causes and functions of social facts through the analysis of the internal environment of society
Use covariation method to verify the existence of causal relationship
Sociological research methods have the following characteristics
independent of philosophy
Research methods are objective
It requires that social facts must be treated as social things
Weber
social action
concept
oriented to the actions of others
That is, it has a subjective meaning directed at others.
personal actions
condition
Is there any subjective meaning?
Is it directed at others?
Classification
purposeful action
Through expectations about the conditions of external things and the behavior of other people
And use this expectation as a "condition" or as a "means"
An action aimed at achieving an end that is rationally pursued and considered as a result
value rational action
By conscious action based on pure belief in the unconditional inherent value of a particular act, whether accomplished or not
emotional action
Actions determined by current mood or emotional situation
traditional action
Actions determined by established habits
Conceptual Tool of Sociological Methodology—“Ideal Types”
feature
It is a construction of subjective thinking, not based on empirical generalizations of all facts, nor is it proposed as a social ideal.
"Ideal" means something that does not exist in reality, not what is best or what people hope for
It is not a random fiction. Its establishment must be logically consistent and cannot violate the empirical causal relationship.
It is abstract to a certain extent, but it does not summarize or attempt to summarize all the characteristics of real things. It only focuses on summarizing a group or certain characteristics of things for the purpose of research.
is value neutral
associated with the process of rationalization that is characteristic of society and modern science
value-relevant and value-neutral
value relevance
The subjective interest shown by the researcher in selecting the topic and collecting materials before the research work begins.
It also refers to the subjective purpose shown by the researcher in the practical application of the conclusions after the research work has been concluded.
value neutrality
After selecting the research object, the researcher must give up any subjective values and observe and analyze strictly with an objective and neutral attitude to ensure the objectivity and scientific nature of the research.
It also includes another meaning, that is, to distinguish between the "field of facts" and the "field of values"
modern sociological theory
structural functionalism
"The Structure of Social Action"
Parsons
Put forward the "will-only theory of action"
It is the first synthesis of modern sociological theory and has a milestone significance for the development of sociological theory.
Although many European writers are involved, this is not a study of the ideas of these theorists, but a new synthesis of the author's views on social action, with the purpose of advocating a new theory - volitional action theory.
social action theory
“Volitional Actionism” (Means-Ends Framework)
unit action
definition
To illustrate action theory, the smallest concrete unit that can be analyzed is the unit action
elements
mover
individual as agent
Purpose
The future goals that the actor wants to achieve
situation
meaning
Environmental factors for goal achievement
content
conditions for action
Actors cannot control and cannot change
means of action
Actors can control
Normative limits
A complex aspect involving thoughts, concepts, behavioral orientations, etc.
Restricts the determination of goals and the selection of means in the process of achieving goals
The main elements related to social action include... Mortal social actions always have a certain purpose, and the realization of its goals cannot be achieved without certain means and conditions. At the same time, all social actions are subject to certain behavioral norms. restrictions
inference
Action is a time process
There is a possibility of error in action
In a special sense, action is subjective to the agent
Although the action situation involves aspects such as the natural environment and biological organisms, its specific content is not what action theory studies.
Coming from the criticism and synthesis of the three traditional methodologies of utilitarianism, positivism, and idealism, it attempts to provide a new explanation of social order.
social conflict theory
Dahrendorf's theory of dialectical conflict
Inheritance and Transformation of Marx’s Thoughts on Conflict Theory
Accepted the views of dialectics of conflict and the inevitable social changes caused by class struggle from Marx’s thought
Corrections
The key factor in class division is not possession of the means of production, but possession of the means of production.
This is a fundamental transformation
Using the presence or absence of authority as the criterion for classifying classes denies the foundation of Marx's class theory and replaces the ownership relationship of the means of production with "authority relationship"
dialectical view of society
Dahrendorf believed that society has two faces: agreement/conflict.
social conflict theory
Root causes of social conflict: uneven distribution of power
“Authority” is the legitimized power that expects submission from others
Features
The authority relationship is always a relationship of superiority and inferiority, master and subordinate.
Any authority relationship exists because society expects those above to control the behavior of those below
This kind of expectation is relatively long-term attached to the individual's social status, rather than attached to the individual's character. Therefore, the expectation is legitimate.
Authority always clearly indicates who must accept control and the scope of control allowed. Authority is different from power. It is definitely not a relationship of controlling others at will.
Authority is a legal relationship, so disobeying the authority’s orders will result in sanctions.
Modern society has formed two classes around "power" and "authority": one is the class that possesses power and enjoys authority, and the other is the class that is forced to obey power and authority. These two classes exist in every organization of society. Therefore, social organization is not a system arising from a common desire, but a mandatory collaborative association with a certain authority structure.
The formation of social conflicts
"Potential benefits" and "explicit benefits"
potential benefits
Potential benefits are objective benefits determined by the roles people assume
It is determined in advance for the continuation of a certain role's position and is independent of personal consciousness.
It is the potential trend of personal behavior
explicit benefits
Explicit interests are interests that people are aware of and pursued as goals.
There are conditions for transforming quasi-groups into manifest groups
Technical conditions
Including leaders and ideologies, etc.
political conditions
degree of political freedom
social conditions
Communication conditions among quasi-group members and changes in social structural patterns
degree of social conflict
conflict intensity
degree of conflict overlap
degree of social mobility
conflict intensity
socioeconomic deprivation
degree of conflict accommodation
the result of social conflict
cause social changes
forms of social change
Replacement of all (or nearly all) ruling personnel
Partial replacement of ruling personnel
The interests of the ruled class are integrated into the policies of the rulers
Metric Characteristics of Social Structural Changes
Fundamental
The degree of structural change involving the personnel of the ruling class, the policies of the ruling class, or the overall basic relationships between classes
Sudden
The speed of structural change involves the speed of change
phenomenological sociology
Schutz's development of Weber
Weber
Human behavior only becomes an action when it is given subjective meaning by the actor and therefore has a clear intention.
This kind of intentional action can become a "social action" only when it is directed toward "others" and therefore has a mutual relationship with "others"
In Weber's methodology, the method of understanding is the most important. That is to say, we need to deeply analyze the situation in which the action takes place in order to be able to enter the subjective world of the actor.
In Weber's sociology, "subjective meaning" became the core of human action
Schutz
Weber's definition of "action" as "meaningful behavior" is too vague
It is useless to distinguish actions and behaviors by "subjectively meaningful" and "subjectively meaningless"
It is important to distinguish between the process (action) and the result (behavior) of the individual actor's conscious activities
Action
self-aware individual actor
Based on a pre-designed plan and directed toward a specific goal in the future
human behavior
Derived from the conscious experience of individual actors
The most prominent feature is purposefulness and planning
"Act"
Refers to an ongoing process of development and is the "result of action"
Action planning is a virtual, imaginary action, and action is a completed action. move.
How do actors obtain the subjective meaning of their own actions in an action situation?
This issue is closely related to the ways and means for actors to obtain a common worldview in the same situation.
Schutz turned the focus of his research to the inter-subjective interrelationships that lead to the interaction of actors' meaning worlds, that is, The problem of “intersubjectivity”
"Intersubjectivity" is the common subjective world between interacting individuals.
This concept covers Weber's action theory, Husserl's concept of life world, and symbolic interactionism on interaction. The theory of constructing the soul's self and social relations in motion
Garfinkel's Ordinary Methodology
People jointly form and make sense of their social world, and they do so methodically and methodically, using social procedures or methods that they share.
Because these methods are shared by members of specific cultures and subcultures, Garfinkel calls them "ordinary methods."
The sociological study of these ordinary people's methods is called "ordinary people's methodology"
Ordinary Methodology studies how these socially shared methods are used to understand, reason and act in the common sense world of everyday life
symbolic interactionism
Theoretical premise
The actions an individual takes towards things are based on the meaning he attaches to them
These meanings arise from the interactive process
These meanings are not fixed but are constantly revised through a process of self-interpretation
principles of interaction
Human beings have the ability to think
The capacity for thought is shaped by social interactions
In social interactions, people acquire meaning and symbols, allowing them to use their unique thinking abilities
The use of meaning and symbolism enables human action and interaction
In actions and interactions, people can modify or change meanings and symbols based on their interpretation of situations
People are able to make the modifications and changes described above in part because of their ability to interact with themselves, to examine their possible courses of action, evaluate their relative pros and cons, and then choose
intertwined patterns of action and interaction that constitute groups and societies
Sociological Research Methodology Principles
Methods of theory construction
Induction
survey research methods
explore
test
Qualitative analysis
Just take a look
positivism
ontological naturalism
Social and cultural phenomena are essentially the same as natural phenomena and follow the same natural laws.
epistemological empiricism
Emphasis on the role of experience and perceptual data in sociological understanding, rejecting speculative social philosophy and metaphysics
Believe that the reliability and truth of sociological knowledge depend on observation and testing
methodological scientism
Social science knowledge should be modeled on natural science
value neutral
instrumental knowledge
Science makes predictions possible, and predictions help control the course of society, restraining its spontaneity and destructiveness
Social knowledge is essentially practice-oriented
marx
"German Ideology"
Explain the author's materialist view of history, and critically analyze the contemporary idealist view of history of Feuerbach, Powell and Stirner
Criticize various representative philosophical views of democratic socialism and German socialism, and express understanding of scientific socialism
social criticism
Frankfurt School
From the Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, affiliated with the University of Frankfurt
The main development goal is to understand social life as a whole and avoid association with real politics
is a broad and comprehensive thought
inheritance of traditional thought
The doctrines of young Marx
Marxist critical thought
The care of "people" in various philosophies
Freud's Psychoanalysis
Germany’s historical situation and contemporary issues
Development of scientific and technological civilization
The rise of totalitarianism
Main representatives
Horkheimer
He coined the term "critical theory", laid the foundation for critical theory, and provided a common basis for discussion for subsequent critical theorists.
Adorno
In the process of criticizing scientism and positivism, he proposed "critical sociology"
And based on this, he put forward various criticisms, the most representative of which is the criticism of popular culture
Marcuse
Based on critical sociology, it has carried out fierce and all-round criticism of various aspects, the most influential of which is the criticism of modern capitalist society.
Fromm
Psychoanalytic theory based on humanism
Focuses on criticizing capitalist society from the aspects of human freedom, human alienation, etc.
Mainly adopts a social psychological approach to criticism
social exchange theory
The main points
The best way to analytically understand most interpersonal behavior is as an exchange of tangible or intangible goods and services.
People are "rational" in the process of exchange and interaction
People act after weighing the pros and cons of their actions and choosing what is most attractive
feature
Directly borrows the concept of exchange from classical economics and expands it to a larger range of social activities
It is a mixture of behaviorist psychology and behavioral economics
Social exchange as an expression of various social relationships
represent
Homans
Focuses on understanding individual behavior at an individual level
behaviorism exchange theory
Peter Blau
Focuses on exploring exchange processes from interpersonal interactions to structural exchange processes
structural exchange theory
Ideological background
Exchange Thought in Classical Political Economy
exchange of ideas in anthropology
The impact of behavioral psychology