The input elements are not comprehensive and specific enough;

The management review output has not been followed up and verified.

Lack of clear management review output;

Common difficulties in daily implementation

The role of managers is not obvious: managers have failed to fully play their due leadership and decision-making role in management review.

Extensive planning: The management review planning is too simple, and the plan formulated is not thorough and detailed enough.

The key points are unknown: The management review content failed to highlight the key points, and no focus was conducted on problems, new environments, and new development businesses that were prone to the operation of the laboratory system, and the risks were not effectively identified.

Time is rushed: The planned review time is compact, which makes it impossible for participants to fully prepare the review elements and each input material.

Lack of supervision: Lack of process supervision and management of relevant elements in management review.

Inadequate understanding: The personnel participating in the management review do not have a comprehensive understanding of the work and do not pay enough attention to the continuous improvement of the management review itself.

Develop a detailed management review planning plan: The management review planning of some institutions only determines the expected time for the review implementation, the participating departments or personnel, and the names of the input elements of the management review, etc. This incomplete planning is difficult in the actual implementation process. Ensure the effectiveness of the review. Therefore, when planning management review plans, at least the following four points should be paid attention to:

Full process management is suitable: Process management has been widely used in the GB/T 19001 - 2016 "Quality Management System Requirements" standard. From Appendix B of GB/T 27025 - 2019 "General Requirements for the Capacity of Inspection and Calibration Inspection and Testing Institutions", it can be seen that the inspection and testing institutions also operate in accordance with GB/T 19001, but in GB/T 27025, the process management requirements are relatively general. This makes it easy for inspection and testing institutions to ignore this problem.

It is recommended to refer to GB/T 19001 for process management, and focus on the following aspects:

The inspection and testing agency should formulate a detailed verification/calibration plan. The plan should cover the instrument number, name, specification model, storage location and other information, clarify the parameters, range, accuracy, etc. that need verification/calibration, and determine the planned verification/calibration. Date, cycle and responsible person.

After completing the verification/calibration, the institution obtains the verification/calibration certificate and needs to conduct measurement confirmation. It can only be put into use after confirming that the requirements are met. The following five major contents need to be confirmed:

It includes the same or similar instrument comparison, similar measurement equipment with higher accuracy levels, equipment comparison that can measure similar parameters, and multiple equipment with the same measurement accuracy levels.

1. Method comparison.

2. Lab-to-labor comparison.

3. Verification of standard substances (including spiking recycling).

4. Single-point self-care.

5. Repeat verification with samples with good stability, etc.

1. Equipment with long calibration cycles.

2. Frequently used equipment.

3. Equipment with large fluctuations in previous calibration results or close to the maximum allowable error.

4. Newly purchased equipment that does not understand its metrological characteristics and changes.

5. Equipment that uses or stores the environment (such as vibration, high humidity, etc.) or has undergone severe changes.

6. Key equipment with high accuracy requirements.

7. Equipment with poor stability (easy to drift, aging, etc.) and frequent use.

8. Equipment that is often brought to the customer's site or out of the agency's management and control.

9. Equipment that is susceptible to damage during use, data is volatile or suspicious.

10. Equipment whose service life is approaching expiration.

11. Equipment that has important value and significant impact on the measurement results (such as greater risks, etc.).

12. Equipment with inspection/calibration methods that stipulate verification.

13. Simple calibration cannot guarantee correct and reliable equipment during the validity period.

14. Verify the sensitivity and stability of equipment that require verification before use, such as the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer when turning on the computer.

15. Equipment with problematic capabilities verification results.

Routine maintenance: Before and after shutdown of each experiment, the instrument and equipment users and storage personnel must clean, inspect, adjust, tighten, and replace individual vulnerable parts of the experimental instrument and equipment.

Regular maintenance: Each instrument and equipment must be maintained in accordance with the specified scope and requirements regardless of its technical condition or the severity of the task.

The maintenance cycle must be determined based on factors such as wear rules, operating conditions, and operating and maintenance levels of various instruments and equipment. If the maintenance cycle is specified in the factory instructions of the instrument and equipment, it should be carried out according to the instructions;

If there is no specified period, the laboratory will formulate it based on actual conditions.

Maintenance according to regulations: Maintenance work should be carried out strictly in accordance with regulations, and the main contents include cleaning and lubrication, fastening, power-on inspection, replacement of worn parts, etc.

Record data: During regular maintenance, technical data must be recorded and included in the equipment archives as the basis for arranging repair plans.

Personnel training principles and requirements teach on demand and strive for practical results: According to the needs of organizational development and the diverse training needs of employees, carry out rich content and flexible form training in layers and categories to enhance the pertinence and effectiveness of education and training , ensure the quality of training.

Independent as the main and commission as the auxiliary: integrate training resources and establish and improve a model with internal training as the main training base.

Based on independent training, do a good job in basic and regular training, and conduct relevant professional training through entrusting professional institutions.

Implementation principles: Adhere to the three implementation principles of training personnel, training content, and training time. For example, in XXXX, the cumulative time for institutional management personnel to participate in quality management training is no less than XX days; the cumulative time for professional and technical personnel to participate in business training is no less than XX days.

9 aspects that personnel training must cover

a.CNAS - Participation required in RL02 "Proficiency Verification Rules"

b. Competency verification participates in the program.

c. Inter-laboratory comparison plan.

d. When formulating an external quality monitoring plan, factors of the internal quality monitoring plan should be considered.

e. Internal quality control results.

f. Availability of inter-laboratory comparisons (including competence verification). For areas where competence verification is not available, laboratories should have other measures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of results.

a. Detection or calibration traffic volume.

b. Use of detection or calibration results.

c. The stability and complexity of the detection or calibration method itself.

d. Dependence on the experience of technicians.

e. The frequency and results of participating in external comparisons (including ability verification).

f. Personnel’s ability and experience, number of personnel and changes.

g. Newly adopted or changed methods.