then i fouces on materials as a starting point from the bref in studio sesstion in westren the artist have diffrrent thing and material but indinidual they are criticaly chalanging and constacting variouse device for chalancing such as huma she was apart of westren canon movment then i wanted to now more a bout coloial , then i find Huma book( location of culture ) she explain colonial in more detail spiseficly ,,Hybridity. my view of point about hybridity was that any thing goes out thire as i dea it doesnt remain prist in the imprial engagments wher you have imprial power that coloniasis another word , another country , both element changed by that intrection by experiance so her work always influnce by colonilisim and idology . so i go back to history of art and try to macke connection between phildabarlow and huma go back to hisrory of art and read abot the age of hitory art wich i found the root of postcolonilisim i figer out that the evaloaion of art shaped the modren art . they both using cheap material trying then i wanted to investgate from where they come with thire idea to craet scalp, they both represent the impact of war so i try to looke at thier root , then , i reasearch on tate website , also go deep then i fine on baltic exhibition to new more about the way and the material huma used so huma mention julie on the interview then go back to philla and compaire them so i try to looke at thier root of movment , idea

phyllida-barlow

Huma Bhabha

i was interested on

Age of Art

the engene i used on my jurny

pushing the formal materials to create anti authiritaraian and anti monmental object

her movment

engaging with the past

sollwitt

proceduer -layering -

Topic