MindMap Gallery 2024 Consulting Engineer 2024 Decision Analysis Evaluation contains error-prone points Printable A4 Chapter 1, Section 3
2024 Consulting Engineer 2024 Decision Analysis and Evaluation contains error-prone points. Printable A4, decision analysis and evaluation, for review and preview, doubled efficiency!
Edited at 2024-03-28 15:06:02This article discusses the Easter eggs and homages in Zootopia 2 that you may have discovered. The main content includes: character and archetype Easter eggs, cinematic universe crossover Easter eggs, animal ecology and behavior references, symbol and metaphor Easter eggs, social satire and brand allusions, and emotional storylines and sequel foreshadowing.
[Zootopia Character Relationship Chart] The idealistic rabbit police officer Judy and the cynical fox conman Nick form a charmingly contrasting duo, rising from street hustlers to become Zootopia police officers!
This is a mind map about Deep Analysis of Character Relationships in Zootopia 2, Main content: 1、 Multi-layer network of relationships: interweaving of main lines, branch lines, and hidden interactions, 2、 Motivation for Character Behavior: Active Promoter and Hidden Intendant, 3、 Key points of interaction: logic of conflict, collaboration, and covert support, 4、 Fun Easter eggs: metaphorical details hidden in interactions.
This article discusses the Easter eggs and homages in Zootopia 2 that you may have discovered. The main content includes: character and archetype Easter eggs, cinematic universe crossover Easter eggs, animal ecology and behavior references, symbol and metaphor Easter eggs, social satire and brand allusions, and emotional storylines and sequel foreshadowing.
[Zootopia Character Relationship Chart] The idealistic rabbit police officer Judy and the cynical fox conman Nick form a charmingly contrasting duo, rising from street hustlers to become Zootopia police officers!
This is a mind map about Deep Analysis of Character Relationships in Zootopia 2, Main content: 1、 Multi-layer network of relationships: interweaving of main lines, branch lines, and hidden interactions, 2、 Motivation for Character Behavior: Active Promoter and Hidden Intendant, 3、 Key points of interaction: logic of conflict, collaboration, and covert support, 4、 Fun Easter eggs: metaphorical details hidden in interactions.
Chapter 1 Section 3
Early project consultation results
1. Basic concepts of engineering consulting
meaning
in principle
2. Business scope of engineering consulting
3. Types of main consulting results in the early stage of the project
Project Planning Research Report
Investment Opportunities Research Report
The content of investment opportunity research includes market survey, consumption analysis, investment policy, tax policy research, etc. The focus of the research is to analyze the investment environment, through the background of the project, market demand, resource conditions, development trends, required inputs and possible products. Conduct preparatory investigation, research and analysis in aspects such as outsourcing and other aspects to discover valuable investment opportunities. See pages 23~24 of the textbook.
Preliminary feasibility study report
The project proposal
feasibility study report
Project application form (report)
Funding Application Report
social evaluation report
post-evaluation report
PPP implementation plan
The preparation of the implementation plan is based on the preliminary work results of the project. The equity structure, division of responsibilities and rights of both parties, financing plan, etc. determined in the implementation plan are mainly based on the overall construction plan, project capital ratio arrangement, and project capital ratio arrangement in the preliminary work results of the project. Based on financial benefit analysis, etc., and further implemented and refined. See textbook P27.
The evaluation content of the government-private partnership (PPP) project implementation plan mainly includes: (1) the necessity of project implementation of the PPP model; (2) whether the project scale and engineering technology plan are reasonable; (3) whether the project operation model and transaction structure are reasonable ; (4) Whether the investment and financing plan is feasible; (5) Value for money evaluation and financial affordability demonstration; (6) Evaluation of PPP contract content and key terms; (7) Whether the social capital party’s procurement plan is reasonable; (8) Government Whether commitment and risk sharing mechanisms are appropriate. See textbook P29.
project evaluation report
Mid-term evaluation and post-evaluation of investment management, specifically including: (1) mid-term evaluation and post-evaluation of special plans; (2) post-evaluation of government investment projects; (3) evaluation of the implementation of special investment projects within the central budget and evaluation of special investment benefits . See textbook P33.
Special research report
4. Interrelationships between pre-project consultation results
Project planning in relation to opportunity studies and project proposals
The relationship between project planning and project proposals (preliminary feasibility studies) and feasibility studies
Compared with the preliminary feasibility study, the feasibility study is generally similar in composition and content. It is an extension and deepening of the preliminary feasibility study. However, the purpose and role of the two stages, the focus of the research demonstration, the research methods and depth requirements, and information There is a clear distinction between the degree of collection and data possession and the underlying data. See textbook P26.
The relationship between project proposal (preliminary feasibility study) and feasibility study
The relationship between project application and feasibility study
The relationship between PPP implementation plan and feasibility study
5. Project evaluation and report
The approval evaluation of enterprise investment projects entrusted by government departments must take into account the investment effect, economics and external impact of the project itself; the project evaluation entrusted by enterprises focuses on the product market prospects of the project and the internal conditions of the project itself. See textbook P27.
Purpose
The basic principle
Project evaluation should follow the principles of "independence, impartiality, science, and reliability" and provide high-quality consulting results and consulting services to the client. See textbook P27.
Classification
effect
Methods and tools
Content and depth requirements for project evaluation reports
Evaluation content of PPP project implementation plan
6. Quality assurance of early project consultation results
(1) Project manager responsibility system
The project manager responsibility system is the basis for ensuring the quality of early project planning work
(2) Results quality evaluation system
internal review
project team
Consulting agency
external review
Project owner
Entrust external audit
(3) Results quality evaluation standards
1. Compliance of preliminary project consultation results with relevant national laws, regulations and policies
2. Consistency between the preliminary consultation results of the project and the development goals of the national economy and social undertakings
3. The client’s satisfaction with the preliminary consultation results of the project
4. Coordination of early project consultation results and the balance of interests of all parties
(4) Selection of consulting agencies
The "short list" institutions shall be dynamically adjusted, in principle, once every three years. If they refuse to accept entrusted tasks twice in total, the National Development and Reform Commission shall delete them from the "short list"; if the evaluation report is evaluated as poor for the first time Consulting agency, the Investment Department conducts interviews and warnings. See textbook P35.
评估机构有下列情形之一的,国家发展改革委应当将其从“短名单”中删除:(1)评估报告有重大失误;(2)累计两次拒绝接受委托任务;(3)未在规定时限或者经批准的延期时限内完成委托任务;(4)违反《工程咨询行业管理办法》有关规定的。参见教材P35。
Taking the professional and technical strength, contract performance, and law-abiding credit record in the past three years as the main indicators
Professional credit (Grade A and B), Grade B professional credit pre-evaluation
The consulting agency has Grade A professional credit, and the unit has been engaged in engineering consulting business for no less than 5 years. See textbook P31.
PPP consulting special credit (Grade A and B), PPP consulting Grade B professional credit pre-evaluation
Taking into account the actual situation of the PPP consulting market, engineering consulting units that do not meet the PPP consulting Grade B special credit standards can apply for PPP consulting Grade B special credit pre-evaluation. The criteria for pre-evaluation are: the unit has no less than 2 consulting engineers (investment) engaged in PPP consulting business, and no less than 6 legal, financial, financial and other professionals, and the two are not counted twice; it meets the requirements of Grade B professional credit and law-abiding credit Documentation requirements. The same unit can only apply for one pre-evaluation, and the pre-evaluation results will automatically expire after one year. See textbook P32.
Grade A comprehensive credit
The completion time limit for consultation and evaluation entrusted by the National Development and Reform Commission generally does not exceed 30 working days. See textbook P34.
Engineering consulting units and their employees shall abide by national laws, regulations and policy requirements, abide by industry norms and professional ethics, and actively participate in and accept industry self-discipline management. Engineering consulting should adhere to the following principles: (1) The principle of independence; (2) The principle of scientificity; (3) The principle of impartiality; (4) The principle of compliance. See pages 22 to 23 of the textbook.