MindMap Gallery Corporate strategic choices
The mind map of the company's strategic selection introduces the stable development strategy, development strategy, development methods of the company's development strategy, defense strategy, and company business portfolio management.
Edited at 2022-05-29 21:24:12This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about bacteria, and its main contents include: overview, morphology, types, structure, reproduction, distribution, application, and expansion. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about plant asexual reproduction, and its main contents include: concept, spore reproduction, vegetative reproduction, tissue culture, and buds. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
This is a mind map about the reproductive development of animals, and its main contents include: insects, frogs, birds, sexual reproduction, and asexual reproduction. The summary is comprehensive and meticulous, suitable as review materials.
Corporate strategic choices
Section 1 stable development strategy
Characteristics of stable development strategy
Reasons for adopting a stable development strategy
Advantages and Disadvantages of Stable Development Strategy
Section 2 development strategy
A strategy that focuses on producing a single product or service
A strategy development approach that focuses on producing a single product or service
Determine specific reasons
Measures and means taken
Benefits and Disadvantages of a Strategy to Concentrate on a Single Product or Service
benefit
Disadvantages
vertical integration strategy
Analysis of pros and cons of vertical integration
Benefits of a vertical integration strategy
Risks of Vertical Integration Strategy
Theoretical basis for vertical integration strategy
Diversification strategy
Related diversification strategies
What and How Relevant Diversification Strategies Mean and How
The meaning of economies of scope
Advantages of Related Diversification Strategies
unrelated diversification strategy
Section 3 How the company's development strategy develops
internal development
Advantages of Internal Development
The risk is relatively small
Strong resource sharing
Accumulate learning ability
Encourage intrapreneurship
Disadvantages of Internal Development
mergers and acquisitions
M&A approach
Reasons for mergers and acquisitions
joint venture
Main reasons for joint ventures
Basic strategies available
Strategic Alliance
form of strategic alliance
contractual agreement
OEM production
Franchise
mutual shareholding
joint venture
Reasons for strategic alliances
Develop new markets
Share research and development risks
Complementary advantages
Conducive to competition
Principles for establishing effective strategic alliances
Identify suitable alliance partners
Clarify the relationship between alliance partners
All parties in the alliance must maintain the necessary flexibility
Insist on cooperation amid competition
Learning from alliance partners in strategic alliances
outsourcing
Section 4 defense strategy
harvest strategy
Adjust strategy
abandon strategy
liquidation strategy
Section 5 Corporate business portfolio management
Growth rate-market share matrix method
Traditional BCG matrix method
Taurus has a lower market growth rate and a higher relative market share
Thin dogs refer to those business units with low relative market share and market growth rate.
Toddlers are those business units with lower relative market share but higher market growth rate
The market growth rate and relative market share of celebrities are high, and the amount of cash needed and generated by babies is large.
BCG new matrix
Large-scale business units have more competitive advantages, but there are not many ways to obtain competitive advantages in this industry.
Specialized operating units have more competitive advantages and ways to achieve these advantages.
Dead-end business units do not have many competitive advantages, and the industry lacks ways to obtain competitive advantages.
Decentralized operating units have more avenues for actual competitive advantage, but the enterprise itself has fewer competitive advantages.
Industry attractiveness-competitive capability analysis method
Factors for evaluating industry attractiveness
Evaluation Factors of Competitiveness
Strategies for Different Types of Business Units
Policy Guidance Matrix Method
The position of business units in the matrix is determined
Thomson and Steckland method
Enterprises in Quadrant 1 are in a superior strategic position. The most reasonable strategy is to focus on existing products or services to maintain or increase market share, and make necessary investments to continue to be in a leading position.
Companies in Quadrant 2 have a good market but weak competition. The recommended strategy is to first focus on existing products or services.
Enterprises in Quadrant 3 are in a stagnant market, and the available strategies are reset strategy, diversification strategy, abandonment strategy, and liquidation strategy.
Although companies in Quadrant Four have low market growth rates but strong competitive positions, related diversification strategies are their first choice. They may also consider unrelated diversification strategies and joint venture strategies.
Matching evaluation matrix method
Business analysis
Characterization of maternal tissue
Construction of matching evaluation matrix