The comparison and selection of announced product project plans often focuses on the social aspect, while also comparing the technical and economic aspects.

The comparison and selection of competitive project plans is mainly based on technical and economic aspects.

reasonable economies of scale

Market Capacity and Competitiveness

Environmental capacity, energy consumption and dual carbon

natural resource supply

Technical and policy requirements

infrastructure and socioeconomic status

empirical method

Survival Techniques Act

scale effect curve method

Indicators that measure the rationality of economic scale usually include

Compliance with industrial policies and industry characteristics

Reasonable use of resources

Adaptability and matching of technology and equipment

Adaptability and matching of construction conditions

Reasonability of benefits (economics)

Advanced nature: good product performance, long product service life, low energy consumption per unit product, high labor productivity, high automation level, long smooth operation cycle, etc.

Applicability: match, adapt

Safety: intrinsically safe

Reliability: stable long-term operation

Economic rationality: less consumption, less investment, low cost, high profit

Comply with clean production process requirements

technical analysis

Economic Analysis

comprehensive analysis

natural environmental factors

transportation factors

market factors

labor factor

social and policy factors

human condition factors

agglomeration factors

Basic requirements for selection of general industrial solid waste disposal sites

Monkey Selection Requirements for Hazardous Waste Storage Facilities

Hazardous waste landfill site selection requirements

Comparison of construction conditions

Investment fee comparison

Operating Expenses Comparison

Comparison of environmental protection conditions

Site safety conditions

Geological hazard risk assessment includes

Normative indicators

Recommended indicators

Comparison of technical indicators

General plan layout cost comparison

Other comparison and selection contents: functional comparison and selection, demolition plan comparison and transportation plan comparison and selection

Meet the functional needs of production and use

Adapt to the calculated site (line direction)

Comply with engineering standards and specifications

Economically reasonable

Engineering solutions for process industry projects

Civil construction engineering plans

Engineering plans for water conservancy and hydropower hub and reservoir projects

Engineering overview and technical requirements for seismic safety assessment

Seismic Activity Environmental Assessment

Seismic location structural evaluation

Fortification intensity or design earthquake parameters

Earthquake location hazard assessment

Other relevant technical information

(1)

(2)

(3)

Total investment return EBIT/total investment

Net profit margin on capital Net profit/capital investment

Features

The time required to recover the total investment (including construction investment and working capital) with the net income of the project

It can be calculated from the year when the project construction starts, or it can be calculated from the year when the project is put into production, but it should be clearly stated.

Features

Use a predetermined benchmark rate of return to discount it to the sum of the present values ​​when the investment plan is implemented.

Features

present value of costs

The discount rate when the cumulative present value of each net cash flow during the calculation period equals zero.

Profitability of the investment proposal as a percentage of uncollected funds

The maximum loan interest rate that the plan can bear

The net present value decreases as the discount rate increases

call it a day algorithm

Features

objective function

Restrictions

(1) Construction of mutually exclusive solution combinations

(2) Comparison and selection method of mutually exclusive solutions