MindMap Gallery Epidemiology - etiology and etiology inference
Epidemiology - etiology and etiology inference, summarizes the concept of etiology and etiology model, Classification of causes and research methods, Logical methods of causal inference, etc.
Edited at 2023-12-21 14:53:30This article discusses the Easter eggs and homages in Zootopia 2 that you may have discovered. The main content includes: character and archetype Easter eggs, cinematic universe crossover Easter eggs, animal ecology and behavior references, symbol and metaphor Easter eggs, social satire and brand allusions, and emotional storylines and sequel foreshadowing.
[Zootopia Character Relationship Chart] The idealistic rabbit police officer Judy and the cynical fox conman Nick form a charmingly contrasting duo, rising from street hustlers to become Zootopia police officers!
This is a mind map about Deep Analysis of Character Relationships in Zootopia 2, Main content: 1、 Multi-layer network of relationships: interweaving of main lines, branch lines, and hidden interactions, 2、 Motivation for Character Behavior: Active Promoter and Hidden Intendant, 3、 Key points of interaction: logic of conflict, collaboration, and covert support, 4、 Fun Easter eggs: metaphorical details hidden in interactions.
This article discusses the Easter eggs and homages in Zootopia 2 that you may have discovered. The main content includes: character and archetype Easter eggs, cinematic universe crossover Easter eggs, animal ecology and behavior references, symbol and metaphor Easter eggs, social satire and brand allusions, and emotional storylines and sequel foreshadowing.
[Zootopia Character Relationship Chart] The idealistic rabbit police officer Judy and the cynical fox conman Nick form a charmingly contrasting duo, rising from street hustlers to become Zootopia police officers!
This is a mind map about Deep Analysis of Character Relationships in Zootopia 2, Main content: 1、 Multi-layer network of relationships: interweaving of main lines, branch lines, and hidden interactions, 2、 Motivation for Character Behavior: Active Promoter and Hidden Intendant, 3、 Key points of interaction: logic of conflict, collaboration, and covert support, 4、 Fun Easter eggs: metaphorical details hidden in interactions.
Cause and etiology inference
Concepts of etiology and etiological models
Definition of cause
lilienfeld probabilistic etiology theory
Those factors that can increase the probability of disease in a population. When one or more of these factors are absent, the probability of the disease in the population decreases.
Cause = risk factor, which refers to factors that increase the probability of disease occurrence
Classification of causes
Necessary cause
eg: For patients with hepatitis B, they must be infected with hepatitis B virus, but those who are infected with hepatitis B virus do not necessarily have hepatitis B.
sufficient cause
etiological model
triangle model
pathogen, host, environment
wheel model
etiology network model
Cause chain
etiology network
Classification of causes and research methods
Classification
Host
genetic factors
immune status
age and gender
Race
mental state
behavioral factors
environment
biological factors
physical factors
chemical factors
social environmental factors
Research methods
basic process
Descriptive research to obtain clues to the cause (logical inference)
Analytical studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) Experimental studies to test hypotheses
Etiology inference
logical method of causal inference
hypothetical deduction
form of reasoning
Deductive reasoning → Inductive reasoning → Testing evidence
Mill criterion
Formation of etiological hypotheses
Seek common ground
Find a different method
Covariation method (dose-response relationship)
Analogy
Exclusion
inference of causation
error
Random error (chance)
Random variation between sample and population
Random variation in the measurement method itself
Systematic error (bias)
The Nature of Statistical Associations—Cause, Bias, Opportunity
type
selection bias
definition
Due to shortcomings in the method of selecting research subjects, there are differences in certain characteristics between those who are selected and those who are not selected, resulting in the selected research subjects not being representative of the population, thus leading to bias in the connection between exposure and disease.
Classification
Admission rate bias (Berkson bias)
Control Method
Select research subjects from multiple hospitals
Current case-new case bias (Neyman bias)
Control Method
During the investigation, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined as new cases.
Detection of symptoms bias (exposure bias)
Control Method
Collected cases include early, middle and late stage patients
attrition bias
Control Method
Select a relatively stable group of people to facilitate follow-up
Add 10% to the estimated sample size
Try to understand the outcome of those who are lost to follow-up
Compare whether there is any difference in the loss to follow-up rate between the exposed group and the non-exposed group
Compare the baseline data of the people who were lost to follow-up with the baseline data of the research subjects who completed the follow-up. If there is no statistical difference, it can be considered that the loss of follow-up is random and has little impact on the results.
non-response bias
Control Method
Select research subjects with good compliance
information bias
definition
During the research implementation phase, due to flaws in the methods of measuring exposure and outcomes, research subjects were misclassified, causing the research results to deviate from the true situation.
Misclassification
indifferent misclassification
differential misclassification
Classification
from research subjects
recall bias
reporting bias
from researchers
diagnostic suspicion bias
Expose suspicion bias
from measuring instruments
measurement bias
control
Use blind methods to collect data whenever possible
Use objective indicators whenever possible
Improve inquiry skills or investigative techniques
Standardization of measuring instruments
confounding bias
feature
is a risk factor for disease
Statistically related to the exposure studied
Not an intermediate cause in the causal chain between exposure factors and disease
control
Strictly follow the principle of random sampling to select research subjects
Strict inclusion criteria
Use a matching approach to select controls
Stratified analysis, standardized or multi-factor models are used for data analysis.
Stratified analysis (M-H method)
step
Stratify for possible confounders
Determine whether OR or RR between layers are equal or similar
Combine the OR or RR of each stratum to obtain the adjusted OR or RR after controlling for confounding factors.
Compare the adjusted OR with the crude OR before stratification, based on the conclusion of “confounding bias” under x2
false association
source
opportunity
Selection bias, information bias, confounding bias
secondary association
source
confounding bias
causal connection
form
Single cause and single effect
Single cause and multiple effects
Multiple causes and single effect
Multiple causes and multiple effects
Inference criteria
Hill Kujo
strength of association
RR>3
OR
associated chronological order
Experimental and cohort studies > Case-control and ecological studies > Cross-sectional studies
specificity of association
Only suitable for infectious diseases
This criterion is useless for chronic diseases
Correlation repeatability
The more times it is repeated, the more convincing the causal inference is.
Experimental research > Observational research
dose response relationship
Consistency between factors and disease distribution
biological plausibility of association
experimental evidence
similarity
If a chemical is known to have a disease-causing effect, and another similar chemical is found to be linked to a certain disease, it is more likely that the causal relationship between the two will be established.