MindMap Gallery Epidemiology - etiology and etiology inference
Epidemiology - etiology and etiology inference, summarizes the concept of etiology and etiology model, Classification of causes and research methods, Logical methods of causal inference, etc.
Edited at 2023-12-21 14:53:30This is a panoramic infographic—currently sweeping across the web—illustrating the comprehensive applications of OpenClaw, a popular open-source AI agent platform. It systematically introduces this intelligent agent framework—affectionately dubbed "Lobster Farming"—helping readers quickly grasp its core value, technical features, application scenarios, and security protocols. It serves as an excellent introductory guide and practical manual.
這是一張最近風靡全網關於熱門開源AI代理平台OpenClaw的全網應用全景圖解。它系統性地介紹了這款被稱為「養龍蝦」的智慧體框架,幫助讀者快速理解其核心價值、技術特性、應用場景及安全規範,是一份極佳的入門指南與實操手冊。此圖主要針對希望利用AI建構自動化工作流程的技術從業人員、中小企業主及效率追求者,透過9大模組層層遞進,全面剖析了OpenClaw從概念到落地的整個過程。 圖中核心內容首先釐清了「養龍蝦」指涉的是OpenClawd開源智能體,並強調其本質是「AI基建」而非一般聊天機器人。隨後詳細比較其與傳統AI助理的區別,擁有記憶管理、權限控制、會話隔離和異常恢復四大基礎能力,支援跨平台存取和多模型相容(如GPT、Claude、Ollama)。同時,圖解提供了完整的部署方案(雲端/本地/Docker),並列舉了辦公室自動化、內容創作、資料收集等五大應用程式場景。此外,還展示了其火爆程度、政府與大廠佈局、安全部署建議及適合/不適合的人群分類。幫助你快速掌握OpenClaw技術架構與應用價值,指導個人或企業建構AI自動化系統,規避資料外洩與權限失控風險,是學習「執行式AI」轉型的權威參考圖譜。
本圖由萬興腦圖繪製,是針對IT研發崗位的結構化個人履歷模板,完整涵蓋求職核心資訊模組。基本資訊區包含姓名、電話、信箱、求職意願及GitHub連結;專業概要要求以2-3句提煉核心優勢;工作經驗以「公司A高級Java開發工程師」為例,以「透過(行動),達成(量化成果)」格式呈現微服務架構設計、系統效能優化、團隊技術規範制定等職責,公司B經歷則聚焦功能模組開發與Elasticsearch搜尋優化;技能專長分程式語言、後端框架、中介軟體、資料庫、容器雲等維度,清楚展示技術堆疊;專案成果以「電商平台秒殺系統」為例,說明技術棧、架構設計、個人貢獻(Redis Lua庫存原子扣減)及KPI;教育背景包含一流大學電腦專業學歷,以及AWS認證解決方案架構師、軟考中級軟體設計師證書。模板邏輯嚴謹,涵蓋IT研發求職全流程關鍵訊息,幫助求職者清晰、量化展示專業能力。
This is a panoramic infographic—currently sweeping across the web—illustrating the comprehensive applications of OpenClaw, a popular open-source AI agent platform. It systematically introduces this intelligent agent framework—affectionately dubbed "Lobster Farming"—helping readers quickly grasp its core value, technical features, application scenarios, and security protocols. It serves as an excellent introductory guide and practical manual.
這是一張最近風靡全網關於熱門開源AI代理平台OpenClaw的全網應用全景圖解。它系統性地介紹了這款被稱為「養龍蝦」的智慧體框架,幫助讀者快速理解其核心價值、技術特性、應用場景及安全規範,是一份極佳的入門指南與實操手冊。此圖主要針對希望利用AI建構自動化工作流程的技術從業人員、中小企業主及效率追求者,透過9大模組層層遞進,全面剖析了OpenClaw從概念到落地的整個過程。 圖中核心內容首先釐清了「養龍蝦」指涉的是OpenClawd開源智能體,並強調其本質是「AI基建」而非一般聊天機器人。隨後詳細比較其與傳統AI助理的區別,擁有記憶管理、權限控制、會話隔離和異常恢復四大基礎能力,支援跨平台存取和多模型相容(如GPT、Claude、Ollama)。同時,圖解提供了完整的部署方案(雲端/本地/Docker),並列舉了辦公室自動化、內容創作、資料收集等五大應用程式場景。此外,還展示了其火爆程度、政府與大廠佈局、安全部署建議及適合/不適合的人群分類。幫助你快速掌握OpenClaw技術架構與應用價值,指導個人或企業建構AI自動化系統,規避資料外洩與權限失控風險,是學習「執行式AI」轉型的權威參考圖譜。
本圖由萬興腦圖繪製,是針對IT研發崗位的結構化個人履歷模板,完整涵蓋求職核心資訊模組。基本資訊區包含姓名、電話、信箱、求職意願及GitHub連結;專業概要要求以2-3句提煉核心優勢;工作經驗以「公司A高級Java開發工程師」為例,以「透過(行動),達成(量化成果)」格式呈現微服務架構設計、系統效能優化、團隊技術規範制定等職責,公司B經歷則聚焦功能模組開發與Elasticsearch搜尋優化;技能專長分程式語言、後端框架、中介軟體、資料庫、容器雲等維度,清楚展示技術堆疊;專案成果以「電商平台秒殺系統」為例,說明技術棧、架構設計、個人貢獻(Redis Lua庫存原子扣減)及KPI;教育背景包含一流大學電腦專業學歷,以及AWS認證解決方案架構師、軟考中級軟體設計師證書。模板邏輯嚴謹,涵蓋IT研發求職全流程關鍵訊息,幫助求職者清晰、量化展示專業能力。
Cause and etiology inference
Concepts of etiology and etiological models
Definition of cause
lilienfeld probabilistic etiology theory
Those factors that can increase the probability of disease in a population. When one or more of these factors are absent, the probability of the disease in the population decreases.
Cause = risk factor, which refers to factors that increase the probability of disease occurrence
Classification of causes
Necessary cause
eg: For patients with hepatitis B, they must be infected with hepatitis B virus, but those who are infected with hepatitis B virus do not necessarily have hepatitis B.
sufficient cause
etiological model
triangle model
pathogen, host, environment
wheel model
etiology network model
Cause chain
etiology network
Classification of causes and research methods
Classification
Host
genetic factors
immune status
age and gender
Race
mental state
behavioral factors
environment
biological factors
physical factors
chemical factors
social environmental factors
Research methods
basic process
Descriptive research to obtain clues to the cause (logical inference)
Analytical studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) Experimental studies to test hypotheses
Etiology inference
logical method of causal inference
hypothetical deduction
form of reasoning
Deductive reasoning → Inductive reasoning → Testing evidence
Mill criterion
Formation of etiological hypotheses
Seek common ground
Find a different method
Covariation method (dose-response relationship)
Analogy
Exclusion
inference of causation
error
Random error (chance)
Random variation between sample and population
Random variation in the measurement method itself
Systematic error (bias)
The Nature of Statistical Associations—Cause, Bias, Opportunity
type
selection bias
definition
Due to shortcomings in the method of selecting research subjects, there are differences in certain characteristics between those who are selected and those who are not selected, resulting in the selected research subjects not being representative of the population, thus leading to bias in the connection between exposure and disease.
Classification
Admission rate bias (Berkson bias)
Control Method
Select research subjects from multiple hospitals
Current case-new case bias (Neyman bias)
Control Method
During the investigation, the inclusion criteria were clearly defined as new cases.
Detection of symptoms bias (exposure bias)
Control Method
Collected cases include early, middle and late stage patients
attrition bias
Control Method
Select a relatively stable group of people to facilitate follow-up
Add 10% to the estimated sample size
Try to understand the outcome of those who are lost to follow-up
Compare whether there is any difference in the loss to follow-up rate between the exposed group and the non-exposed group
Compare the baseline data of the people who were lost to follow-up with the baseline data of the research subjects who completed the follow-up. If there is no statistical difference, it can be considered that the loss of follow-up is random and has little impact on the results.
non-response bias
Control Method
Select research subjects with good compliance
information bias
definition
During the research implementation phase, due to flaws in the methods of measuring exposure and outcomes, research subjects were misclassified, causing the research results to deviate from the true situation.
Misclassification
indifferent misclassification
differential misclassification
Classification
from research subjects
recall bias
reporting bias
from researchers
diagnostic suspicion bias
Expose suspicion bias
from measuring instruments
measurement bias
control
Use blind methods to collect data whenever possible
Use objective indicators whenever possible
Improve inquiry skills or investigative techniques
Standardization of measuring instruments
confounding bias
feature
is a risk factor for disease
Statistically related to the exposure studied
Not an intermediate cause in the causal chain between exposure factors and disease
control
Strictly follow the principle of random sampling to select research subjects
Strict inclusion criteria
Use a matching approach to select controls
Stratified analysis, standardized or multi-factor models are used for data analysis.
Stratified analysis (M-H method)
step
Stratify for possible confounders
Determine whether OR or RR between layers are equal or similar
Combine the OR or RR of each stratum to obtain the adjusted OR or RR after controlling for confounding factors.
Compare the adjusted OR with the crude OR before stratification, based on the conclusion of “confounding bias” under x2
false association
source
opportunity
Selection bias, information bias, confounding bias
secondary association
source
confounding bias
causal connection
form
Single cause and single effect
Single cause and multiple effects
Multiple causes and single effect
Multiple causes and multiple effects
Inference criteria
Hill Kujo
strength of association
RR>3
OR
associated chronological order
Experimental and cohort studies > Case-control and ecological studies > Cross-sectional studies
specificity of association
Only suitable for infectious diseases
This criterion is useless for chronic diseases
Correlation repeatability
The more times it is repeated, the more convincing the causal inference is.
Experimental research > Observational research
dose response relationship
Consistency between factors and disease distribution
biological plausibility of association
experimental evidence
similarity
If a chemical is known to have a disease-causing effect, and another similar chemical is found to be linked to a certain disease, it is more likely that the causal relationship between the two will be established.